Where does HIV live?
The
worldwide dissemination of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) over the
past four decades is one of the most catastrophic examples of the emergence,
transmission and propagation of a microbial genome. We now know that the
cellular and anatomical sites of HIV replication influence the course
of the infection, the ability of antiretroviral therapy to reduce viremia
and the establishment of the viral reservoir. This highly mutable virus
inserts its genome into the genomes of crucially important cells of the
host and despite therapy, maintains a reservoir of latent HIV within the
body. The virus has a predilection for activated HIV-specific CD4+T cells,
although other cells are also susceptible to the virus. This tropism for
particular cells is determined mainly by cellular receptors to which HIV
attaches in order to enter cells. In this review, the anatomical localization
will be discussed.
The anatomical home of HIV
Lymphoid organs
The tissue distribution of target cells defines the anatomical reservoirs
of HIV. In acute infection, the mucosa is the dominant site of infection.
The gastrointestinal tract and other mucosal tissues contain at steady
state and many of them are in an activated state. During acute HIV infection,
the virus rapidly multiplies and propagates in the lymphoid component
of mucosal tissues, thereby profoundly affecting the immune system soon
after infection. In macaques infected with SIV, intestinal CD4+T cells
are almost entirely depleted within three weeks after infection.
During the acute phase and into the chronic phase of infection, the sites
of HIV replication begin to include other peripheral lymphoid organs.
High levels of HIV accumulate in lymph-node follicular dendritic cells,
which are of epithelial origin and therefore distinct from the dendritic
cells of hematopoietic origin. These cells may become a major reservoir
of infectious HIV in the later stages of infection. There are many more
infected cells in lymph nodes than in the blood (which in any case contains
fewer than 2 per cent of total body lymphocytes). Indeed, ongoing high-level
viral replication and the ensuing activation of T cells within the lymph
nodes may be responsible for the destruction of lymph-node architecture
that is typical of the infection.
The primary sites of lymphopoiesis -- the thymus and bone marrow -- may
also be sites of HIV replication. In both children and adults, HIV infection
causes involution of the thymus and depletion of thymocytes. Thymocytes
at almost all stages of maturation are targets of HIV infection.
The central nervous system
The capacity of HIV to cause disease in the central nervous system suggests
that the virus may persist and replicate there. Viral particles have been
identified in brain-derived macrophages and microglia and isolated from
the cerebrospinal fluid. In patients with neurologic symptoms associated
with AIDS, HIV-specific antibodies have been detected in the cerebrospinal
fluid. HIV isolated from cerebrospinal fluid tends to be more macrophage-tropic
than does virus circulating in plasma, and thus HIV replication may be
compartmentalized in the central nervous system. The HIV transactivating
factor Tat, which is taken up into neurons by means of CD91, is thought
to exert neurotoxic effects by increasing the production of nitric oxide
and interfering with the integrity of the blood brain barrier.
The penetration of antiretroviral drugs into the central nervous system
and the maintenance of high therapeutic levels of these drugs are matters
of concern, since the levels of all classes of antiretroviral agents are
lower in the cerebrospinal fluid than in the plasma. Indeed, different
patterns of drug resistance mutations have been observed in viral isolates
from paired samples of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from patients who
are following nonsuppressive antiretroviral regimens. Thus, the central
nervous system may act as a reservoir for replication of HIV even during
maximal treatment with antiretroviral agents.
The genitourinary tract
The blood-testis barrier does not prevent virus from reaching semen. HIV
replication has been detected in T cells and macrophages present in semen
and within the renal epithelium. In situ hybridization of renal biopsy
tissue from patients with HIV nephropathy suggests the presence of a reservoir
of HIV, even in patients with undetectable levels of viral RNA in plasma.
Similarly, HIV has been detected in macrophages and lymphocytes within
the cervix. As with the virus that is found in cerebrospinal fluid, the
genotypic and phenotypic compartmentalization of HIV from genital secretions
suggests that antiretroviral drugs have difficulty penetrating into this
site. These factors clearly affect not only the course of the infection
within individual patients, but also the transmission of the virus to
sexual partners.
Future perspectives
HIV infection appears to be a zoonosis, with AIDS resulting from the failure
of HIV to adapt to a relatively new host or perhaps a failure of humans
to adapt to a relatively new host, or perhaps a failure of humans to adapt
to HIV infection. Either mechanism suggests that HIV and humans will eventually
adapt and coexist, akin to the situation observed in natural SIV infection
of chimpanzees and certain old world monkeys, clearly. The epidemic has
already caused dramatic shifts in mortality within human populations worldwide.
Evidence is also emerging that immunologic pressure against HIV in human
hosts is causing population-dependent genetic changes in the virus itself.
For example, the immunogenicity of regions of the virus that are potential
targets for CD8+T cells restricted through the more common HLA class I
alleles has been widely eliminated from the pool of viruses circulating
in the human population. This suggests that the viruses currently infecting
people already reflect the changes of an evolving host-pathogen relationship.
Although the eradication of HIV is a daunting task the goal of long-term
containment of viral replication and prevention of immune dysfunction
is eminently achievable. It is unlikely that current or more potent drug
regimens, even if initiated early, will be able to eradicate virus within
an infected person, since the T-cell reservoir of virus diminishes too
slowly. Attempts to interrupt therapy in a structured fashion, aimed variously
at reducing the toxic effects of the drugs or boosting HIV-specific immunity,
have unfortunately failed to prove feasible because the virus inevitably
and rapidly reemerges. However, the reactivation of latent reservoirs
in order to "flush out" and then tackle the virus is currently
a subject of intense and promising investigation. Such alternative strategies
are critical, since drug-related toxic effects are becoming one of the
major obstacles to long-term therapy.
Source:
THE LANCET, April 29, 2004 / The Daily Star (Oct 24, 2004)
|